Other Blogs

Stories; very short, short and long: http://greyliteratureandlinguistics.blogspot.ca/

Jewish atrocities in Palestine

Jewish atrocities in Palestine
Gaza children buried alive

Sunday, November 21, 2010

Islam: Is Muhammad a child molester, a womanizer and homosexual?


This post is not a re-writing other posts bearing the same title. I have just noticed that the other posts have been so frequently visited that I thought of just pulling them together into one lengthy post, thinking that thus it will be easier for the reader to concentrate on having an answer to such a million dollar question that has been raised by orientalists again and over again, and been refuted every time it was raised. But they never rest!

I'm not a preacher, but I've studied comparative religions: Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikhism and as necessary complementary part of my study; paganism and atheism.

As far as Islam is concerned, I did study: Islamic law (Fikh/Shari'ah), also known as "Islamic jurisprudence", Interpretation of the Holy Qur'an, Islamic history, Biography of Prophet Muhammad Life (Sirah Nabawiyyah), Arabic language; both grammar and literature along with my core subjects which was mainly Comparative Linguistics and Simultaneous Interpretation.

However, after obtaining my Bachelor from one of the most ancient and still functioning university on earth; Al-Azhar University, I did my further studies on the above. I embarking on a journey for finding the truth. Therefore, with an open mind, and unbiased attitude, I had to hang my believes on a peg on the wall, so that whenever I'm faced with an idea, theory, and information contradicting  my believes, I would approach it with a clear and open mind.

Thus, I also studied Astrology, Theosophy, Extraterrestrial and  the so-called Jewish mystic wisdom; the Kabbalah including the Zohar (Splendor or Radiance) and Moreh Nevuchim (The Guide for the Perplexed ), both of Moses Maimonides, The Incoherence of the Philosophers or collapse of the philosophers  (Arabic: Tahāfut al-Falāsifa) by Al-Ghazali, and the answer thereto "Collapse of the Collapse or The Incoherence of the Incoherence (Arabic: Tahāfut al-Tahāfut" by Ibn Rushd (Averroes)

In order: Ibn Rush (Averos), Ibn Sina (Avisenna), Ibn Maimoun (the Maimounedes)

As far as Islam is concerned, I've read hundreds of books on the above subjects. Some were supporting Islam, and some were against it. Many of such books of both parties were written by "orientalists", Some of whom were obviously biased and meant to spread hatred, and some fairly used solid reasoning, crediting and discrediting Islam.

In a nutshell, I found throughout my reading that there was a common denominator: Judging religions according to behaviorism of the followers of the concerned religions. My viewpoint is if one judge a religion by conclusions he/she attained regarding its followers, even a philosophy or any of what ends with the famous "ism", he/she will be distracted from his/her main course, because followers of religions  have all the time committed atrocities throughout history.

Many cases were raised against Islam by orientalist (scholars interested in Middle Eastern religion, mainly Islam, and culture), though those cases have been refuted throughout history multiple times. Currently, those cases are raised again due to political and propaganda reasons, mainly by the Zionist propaganda machine and the Evangelist Church which is blindly following the Zionist steps. Others do the same thing due to their hate, fear and ignorance.

Some of the myths that have been refuted as I mentioned before are: 1. Muhammad is a pedophile as he married a prepubescent girl named "Ayesha", the daughter of his close friend "Abu-Bakr", 2. Muhammad is a womanizer as he had so many wives, and 3. Islam is a religion of violence.

Though the above has been refuted many times, I'm going to explain why the above is not true. My comments on Ms. Kidd's are in ITALIC

By: Devvy Kidd
December 25, 2006

"...I spent a considerable amount of time researching Islam and Muslims. According to Ten Misconceptions about Islam published by the University of Southern California, USC-MSA Compendium of Muslim Texts: Islam is the name of a way of life which the Creator wants us to follow. We avoid the word religion because in many non-Islamic societies, there is a separation of "religion and state. This separation is not recognized at all in Islam: the Creator is very much concerned with all that we do, including the political, social, economic, and other aspects of our society. Hence, Islam is a complete way of life.....Islam is the way of life; Muslims are people who claim to follow that way of life. Muslims claim their religion (way of life) is peaceful, but the facts tell us otherwise. I believe it's well documented that terrorists who are responsible for mass slaughter around this world are Muslims and now they are right here in America in your back yard building their terrorist cells; see here and here."

 I've read many books and newspapers' columns written by journalists, and I have found the following: one of the definitions of "juournalism" is "the collection and editing of news for presentation through the media". Another one is "writing designed to appeal to current popular taste or public interest".

A Journalist is someone who practices in accordance with the aforementioned. Hence, I've found journalists to be of three types: 1. Journalists with horizontal knowledge (shallow, and of bits and pieces). This type is concerned with collecting as much information as possible on many subjects. Being absorbed by covering many subjects, they do not really spend more time for authenticating their individual issues, but tend to only scratch the surface, 2. journalists with vertical knowledge (profound, deep). This type is composed of professionals specialized on a specific subject and journalism has become for them a way of publishing what they know. Example: a theist who has a column on religion on a newspaper, or a scientist, a doctor, and so on,  and 3. journalists with horizontal-vertical knowledge rather deep bits and pieces. Those are who have to cover many subjects, but spent a bit more time studying them.

I'm not going to categorize Ms. Devvy Kidd. I have visited her site and found many article worthy of reading. She is intelligent, but as far as Islam is concerned, I believe she only scratched the surface for the following reasons: 1. When Islam and the Qur'an are concerned, you have to be able to understand, and speak Arabic, you have to study the history of the revelation of the Qur'an, when and why verses have been revealed and for what purpose, and how to read the Qur'an; (ah'kaam al-kira'ah/rules of reading): a) when to continue reading, b) when to pause, c) when to stop, and d) when to connect. You have to be a person who is well-versed in the Arabic language; grammar, etymology and philology. A translation of the Qur'an is not the right way to understand the Qur'an. My golden rule is: translation is always a betrayal of the origion text. This is exactly what happened to the Christian bible; a great deal of corruption of translation from whatever the source is.

Someone may wounder saying, WOW...do all Muslims know that? My answer is, of course not, and that is why they have to consult with "Ulama/scholars" whenever they are faced with difficulties in understanding their book. Some are ignorant and think they understand the book very well, or perhaps they do understand it very well, but twist its interpretation to serve their personal agenda. And those eventually become terrorists, not because Islam is preaching violence.

Yes, it is true that Muslims claim that their religion (way of life) is peaceful as Ms. Kidd mentioned above, but do all Muslims carry out the dictates of Islam? No, and that is why I believe Ms. Kidd is very shallow in her thinking. She fell in the trap I mentioned above; Judging religions by their judgment of its followers. Islam is a peaceful religion and doesn't preach violence. If some Muslims do so, then one should limit his/her criticism to those Muslims, without even giving himself the right to say that "all Muslims are the same"

Ms. Kidd has the right to be worried about that kind of Muslims who maybe around in the USA, concuting plans to hurt American people. But this Muslim segment does in no way represent Islam. I wonder why is Ms. Kidd is so critical of Muslims and Islam while the Zionists are in fact destroying her country! Does she know that, or she opts not to talk about it to avoind troubles? I don't know. She might have written unbiased article about Zionism. But as far as this article about Muslims and Islam, is concerned she is way off line.

"Ask the people in the little town of Lodi, California, 45 miles south of Sacramento: June 17, 2005, the New California Media reported, "Pakistani community in the farming city of Lodi, Calif., was stunned when FBI last week arrested two Pakistani Americans and three Pakistani nationals for allegedly operating an Al Qaeda cell in the city. One of the men arrested, 22-year Hamid Hayat, is accused in a FBI criminal complaint of training in an Al Qaeda camp in Pakistan to learn 'how to kill Americans' and then lying to FBI agents about it. His father, 47-year Umer Hayat, is charged in the complaint with lying about his son's involvement and his own financing of the Al Qaeda camp. Meanwhile, two Pakistani nationals, Shabbir Ahmed, imam of the Lodi Mosque, and Mohammad Adil Khan, a former Imam of the mosque, were arrested on June 6 on the charge of immigration violations. The next day Mohammad Hassan Adil, 19, son of Mohammad Khan, was also arrested on immigration violations."

 According to the sworn affidavit, Hamid Hayat admitted to agents he attended known terrorist camps for six months in 2003 and 2004, where he was trained in how to kill Americans, return to the United States and hide behind his "peaceful" religion. Living only an hour away from Lodi back then, I am very familiar with that round up of Muslims who were in violation of federal immigration laws and had proven involvement with terrorist camps and organizations. This is not an isolated situation. Hayat was convicted on terrorism charges; see here. Just your friendly, peaceful Muslim next door, right?"

I don't know about the above, but I've my doubts about many such arrests' legality. But giving her the benefit of doubt, I reiterate that those people do not represent Islam and the majority of Muslims. You just cannot judge the greater sum by your judgment of the lesser sum. Here is a simple lesson in LOGIC:

Premise: Students in class 6 are smart
              Alex is a student in class 6
Conclusion:   Alex is smart 

Wrong conclusion for the simple reason that we have to use "quantifiers" and/ or "Qualifiers" - "students" could be "some" students or "all" students in class 6. So a qualifier should be used to make the distinction.

"all" students. Therefor:

Premise: ALL students in class 6 are smart
             Alex is a student in class 6
ConclusionAlex is smart 

This is a correct logical deduction because the premise is correctly formed. Therefore not ALL Muslims are terrorists.

If Ms. Kidd is not kidding, then what about Christian people: 1. world war I, 2. world war II (Christian killing Christians), 3. war in Iraq (Christians killing Muslims and Christian for no reason), and 4. war in Afghanistan (Christians killing Muslims for no reason). 

No matter how you put it and reason about it, it is still Christians killing innocent civilians in those countries, and ten of millions of innocent civilians have beel killed durting the two great wars. Therefore, my advice to any journalist is "be a good shepherd and count your sheep before taking them home, as the big bad wolf might have sneaked in and snatched a little lam away"

Ms. Kid is not a good shepherd as 
her biaseanger and fear are  blinding her; 
three qualities which are very dangerous 
because they mislead the reader.

Ms. Kid, have you heard about water-boarding? Have you heard of American Jews who hold dual citizenship despite it is constitutionally illegal, and nobody is doing anything about it? So please, don't talk about federal immigration laws when your house is made of glass.

"Of course not all Muslims are terrorists, but many of us legitimately wondered why after 911, talk show pundits had to keep begging Muslim spokesmen in leadership positions with the Muslim faithful to denounce violence committed by Muslims? To me, it was a very vivid picture of how to hide your true feelings while spinning pat responses"

"Of course not all Muslims are terrorists". 
WOW, this is a good tip...thank you!...now after being smeared, I've enough change in my hand to go to McDoald and place an order for a big Mac.

"Enough credible research clearly shows that Muslims, despite their denials, hate Americans because in their eyes, we are "non believers" of their Allah. We are infidels. If you think that's an unfair statement, just consider the massive violence and destruction by Muslims over silly cartoons or anyone who disagrees with their Muhammad or "way of life" outlined in the Quran. In my research I found a web site dedicated to stopping the abuse of women and children in the name of the Prophet Mohammad. Dr. Homa Darabi was born to her mother, a child bride at age 13. Dr. Darabi brings to light abuses under Islam against women and the practice of pedophilia."

Yes, a great number of Muslims hate America, not Americans, and I'm one of them. Do not mix your oranges with you lemons. The reason they hate America is because of  its lousy foreign policy which is hurting them deeply. Have you heard of the continuous American blind support to Israel despite what Israel did to the Gazan people, and is doing to Palestinians throughout the Satanic state of Israel? And WOW, so your information is based on some web sites on the internet. Ms. Kidd if you are preparing a theases for your Phd, references to web sites are not credible. I myself can say what the hell I want on this blog of mine. Do you know that there are thousands of Zionist web sites promoting lies on the Internet?

As regards "Dr. Darabi brings to light abuses under Islam against women and the practice of pedophila.", rest assured I'm going to comment on it, and you will be surprised when I show you how shallow you're.

 Jews and their rabbisy kill children and innocent civilians, and harvest organs and launder money


By: Devvy Kidd
December 25, 2006

"According to the USC-MSA Compendium of Muslim Texts referenced above, "Allah orders us in this verse to conduct our matters by taking counsel among ourselves, or by consulting each other.

This is the methodology of the Islamic state, to consult one another, but to always keep the Qur'an and Sunnah paramount. "Any law which contradicts the Qur'an or Sunnah is unlawful." Ellison cannot take an oath with his hand on the Quran and swear his allegiance to what it demands and swear to uphold our Constitution and Bill of Rights because they are incompatible. (Definition of Sunnah: The way of life prescribed as normative in Islam, based on the teachings and practices of Muhammad and on exegesis of the Koran. Also called hadith. Muhammad's way of life viewed as a model for Muslims." Muhammad married a child of six and had sex with her at age nine. Some role model.)"

Now, the above demonstrate, not only how ignorant Ms. Kidd is, 
but also how stupid, too.

Yes, this is the way that should be for any Islamic state. It is called "Shurah", which means "consultation", and there is absolutely nothing wrong with it. "Shurah" is a noun derived from the three-letter verb "sha-wa -ra/SWR) which, accroding to the Hans wehr's Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic, means: 1. to ask someone's advice, 2. to consult, or take council, and 3. reflect, bethink, point out, etc. so what is wrong with that?! No wonder, the American foriegn policies are not sound because they are not subjected to the above "consultation, advice-taking, council-taking, etc), but they are the enforcement and intimidation of elite "do waht I say, or either you'll be ousted or scandalized"

This is the law in an Islamic country and is nothing of Ms. Kidd's concern.

But when the matter involves a Muslim living in a country of a different religion, then the case is different. This Muslim has to abide by that country's law. In the meantime, the country should not impose on a Muslim anything that is fundamentally forbidden in Islam.

EXAMPLES involving non-muslim minorities living in a Muslim state: It is stated in Islamic jerisprudence (religious law) that Muslims are forbidden to drink alcohol. Therefor, if a Muslim break the jar in which another Muslim is brewing alcohol or drinking from it, he is not to be punished or pay a compensation to the Muslim who owned the Jar. But if a Muslim do the same thing to a non-Muslim (Jew, Christian, etc), he is to be punished and to pay compensation.

Accordingly, Jews eat kosher meat, then they should be allowed to do so. If Christians eat ham, then they should be able to create their own product and look after it themselves without any religious interference of the Islamic state.

The point is as long as the above doesn't - and it doesn't - have an impact on the Muslim society where the non-Muslim minorities live - it is all right. Commonsense is also taken in consideration where some habits or practices are prohibited no matter what, like: cannibalism, public nudity, etc. In a nutshell, there is a grey area where it should be gently discussed with the minorities' religious authorities, and both parties have to compromise and reach a reasonable solution.

If Muslims eat halal meat, then they should create their own halal meat. If Jews eat kosher meat, then they should do the same. Both should not impose their eating habits on each other or on Christians, atheists or whomever; a case which is not true as regards Jews in the US because they have already imposed their kosher stuff on none-Jewish factories, forcing none-Jews unnecessary tax which at the end of the day is coveted by them.

I'm sure that Ms. Kidd knows about the abovementioned kosher case, but maybe she wouln't dare write and article about  it. She is conveniently comfortable attacking Islam. But when the Jews are involved, her precausion kiks in.

"Americans need to take very seriously what has happened to France and England as a result of their "tolerance" of Muslims flooding into their countries and then demanding those countries cave into their demands or feel their wrath. How quickly people forget how these "peaceful" people lit a match to cities in France while they rioted day after day; see here. If you think this isn't what's coming to America, think again because the agenda is to force Islam on Americans and destroy our Christian nation. How long before Muslims like Keith Ellison who get elected to Congress began to simply ignore our laws or demand Sharia law replace our laws."

Now, Ms. Kidd is starting to sound like Evangelical and Zionist propaganda by disregarding the ethics of journalism.

 If in any case if someone, at the court of law, askes me to swear on the Bible, I won't do it, simply because I'm not Christian, not that I don't respect the Christian Bible. I would swear on the Qur'an because that is the book I believe in, hence I am bound to tell the truth and nothing but the truth. Another solution to satisfy all Jews, Christians and Muslims is raise up the hand and swear. In my openions, this  resolves the conflict, and doesn't mean any disrespect to the Tanach, the Bible or the Qur'an.

"Sharia, derived from several sources including the Koran, is applied to varying degrees in predominantly Muslim countries but it has no binding status in Britain. However, the BBC Radio 4 programme Law in Action produced evidence yesterday that it was being used by some Muslims as an alternative to English criminal law. Aydarus Yusuf, 29, a youth worker from Somalia, recalled a stabbing case that was decided by an unofficial Somali "court" sitting in Woolwich, south-east London."

I have already discussed how minorities' believes according to Islam, 
not to what some Muslims believe, should be  accommodated be it a Muslim 
or non-Muslim society.

I don't know what the details are as regards Muslims in Britain, France, or Germany, etc., but I know that they're not trying to substitute the laws held by those countries. But their are parts of the Shariah that Muslim cannot forfeit because they are very important fundamentals of their belief and can be applied without causing any serious impact on the British society. Example: marriage and divorce, burial in Islam, if let to be handled according to a minority's belief, how on earth would it be a negative impact on the Brits?

Did Muslims riot in Britain saying, stop alcohol production, pork meat should not be on display in market places, usury - which by the way is a devastating invention - should not be allowed, and so on. NO! They didn't. The Qur'an says (my translation): "We have guided him [Man]  to both roads [ways]..."; the road leading to rightfulness, and the road leading to wrongfulness. This is freedom of choice. Aren't people any more capable of tolerance and "live and let live"? Obviously according to Ms. Kidd they shouldn't be.

Christians marry in the church, Muslims marry in the mosque. Does this breach the holy secular laws of a country, or even its laws which is based on the Bible? Who is intolerant her, Muslims or Christians?

"Organizations like CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) will lead the way in demanding we flush our laws to accommodate theirs. As someone who follows very closely the activities of organizations like CAIR, I am not afraid to call it as I see it: CAIR's principle mouthpieces are little better than thugs in expensive suits using religion to promote their "way of life" and intimidate gutless politicians in Washington, DC and the state houses. If these sissy, prissy, politicians don't cave, out comes the old, reliable smear tactics of "racism" and "bigotry." These people have redefined the term "spin masters." While they mouth PC platitudes like, "We revere Jesus," Muslims believe Jesus was some run of the mill prophet and not the Son of God, which is blasphemous to Christians."

Shofar being blown, and only lies come out of it

Is Ms Kidd blowing a shofar here. Yes, Muslims revere and believe in Jesus Christ. It is a fundamental part of their "Iman" (Faith). The way they believe in him is none but the Muslims' concern. And they do not believe in Jesus as "run of the mill" prophet, but one of the so many most honorable prophets sent by God. It may be blasphemous to the Christians, but Christians can believe in Jesus any way they like. It shouldn't be any of Muslims' concern. Is Ms. Kidd blind? Jews don not only believe in Jesus at all,  but they are also far beyond that. Dare she comment on that.

Jewish Woman Admits To Sacrificing a Baby
 on Oprah!

Is Ms. Kidd trying to impose her belief on non-Christian, or she is pushing a hot button instigating Christians against Muslim? Why doesn't she instigate Christians against Jews who are said  to have crucified and killed him.

Racism and spin mastering aren't Muslim favorite cup of tea. 
Open you eyes and look around to see who is every other moment crying "Racism, anti-sematism, etc."

"I continue to see this statement come from the media and other sources: "There are 1.1 billion Muslims in the world." How do they know that? Who went out and counted heads? No one seems to know where this number, taken as fact, came from or when. One thing I do know: Muslims intend that one day America be a Muslim nation. I refer you now to an unsolicited e-mail I received from the Islamic Center of Beverly Hills titled Current Issues: Republicans, Democrats and Islamic Solutions. I put this in a pdf file here. In this comparison table, the Islamic solution to foreign policy for America is: "Promote world government under United Nations. In Islam nationalism is similar to racism."

What a crockpot full of crap! 
Does it matter whether Muslims are counted in billions or millions or even thousands? 
This is a lousy start for this paragraph, but a good introduction - stupid, though, I think - to Ms. Kidd's nastiness "Muslims intend that one day America be a Muslim nation". 

WOW, Muslims!!! What do you think they have done so far to achieve such an enormous goal? They had been colonizedblood-sucked, cheated and betrayed by Christian Britain, Christian France, Christian Holland for hundreds of year, and  they just shook off the shackles of imperialism a few decades a go, and are still colonized, but implicitly. Have you Ms. Kidd heard of "masked imperialism" and "naked imperialism"?

" Keith Ellison, as a Muslim, pledges his allegiance to Islam which believes America should not exist as a sovereign nation. They close out their laundry list by stating: "We are 10 million American-Muslim now we must grow 5% per year so in 2070 we must have 100 million Muslims in America...We need more Islamic school in America to promote peaceful, loving and caring Islam to our future generations."

Islam has lived with Christian neighbors for thousands of years, untill the stinky crusaders attacked Muslims under false pretenses - history repeats itself - like the idiot US president, George Bush, when he unjustifiably invaded Iraq. 

Muslims and Christians fough together in Egypt against the British occupation in Sa'ad Zaghlouls' revolution of 1919.  Ask Palestinian Christians, and they will tell you that they have always lived peacefully with their Muslim brothers. Read history of the Arabian invasion of Roman-occupied Egypt.  Amro Ibn Al-Aas asked the Christian priests not to be afraid and come out of their hiding places; hidden places and ancient Egyptians' tombs because they suffered immensely at the hands of the Christian Romans

Do you know that Muhammad married a christian woman named "Mary". She was coptic (Egyptian Christian). 
 Do you know that the Vatican's hands are soaked in blood of millions of people in Europe, including the blood of Muslims?

Ms. Kidd, I think you should go back to school and re-study history. But a self-absorbed American like you would not do that, because Americans do not give a damn about other people's culture. This is my first-hand experience with Americans I worked with.

If the "boogie" Muslims in the USA increase in number by birth or reversion to Islam and ask for more schools, why would this bother you? 
Aren't they American citizens? 
Churches are tax-exempted in the USA. Did Muslims ever raise a hand and interject? Had the schools been Christian schools, would the case been any different?

"Keith Ellison thinks America is a democracy, which clearly demonstrates he has no understanding of our legal form of government and is not qualified to serve in the U.S. Congress. He is for rewarding criminals by allowing those who have smuggled themselves across our borders (illegal aliens) with a free pass for citizenship. Ellison uses lots of cleverly worded "fellowship" propaganda, but he is not opposed to sodomites and lesbians marrying, which is in direct opposition to the "way of life" required under Islam. Ellison is for murdering unborn babies, also in opposition to the "way of life" required in Islam. Ellison goes from being a Catholic (abortion is forbidden as well as homosexuality and "same sex" marriages) to the Nation of Islam, to being a good pro-sodomy, pro-abortion Democrat. It would appear Ellison is a quick change artist who uses what ever works for his agenda. Should he be allowed to serve in Congress?"

I am confused. 
I do not know whether I'll take the above as agains, or pro-Islam. 

Since Islam and Christianity both oppose the case mentioned above: homosexuality, abortion, etc, I am obliged to state that  Keith Ellison is not the right representative of Muslims in the congress. No doubt he is not the right representative of ISLAM, but he is serving his own personal agenda. But again, Ms. Kidd, which people are the majority in the USA Congress?...what! I cannot hear you...Did you say Talmudic Zionist Jews? Thank you..Go, please, and blame them. Do not pour all your anger  and malice on a lousy Muslim guy.

I believe as Judge Roy Moore so succinctly states in his recent column that he should not: "Islamic law is simply incompatible with our law. Jaafar Sheikh Idris, founder and chairman of American Open University, a radical Islamic school that has received funding from suspected al-Qaida sources and which supports Islamic law, recently stated that "Islam cannot be separated from the state,"and that no Muslim elected to Congress or the White House can swear to uphold the United States Constitution and still be a Muslim, because the law of Allah as expressed in the Qur'an is supreme. Idris was recently deported for his illegal activities. While we certainly disagree with Idris' radical extremism, he at least knows what Islam is all about!"

Jaafar Sheikh is right to some extent as regards "Islam cannot be separated from the state", 
but not all the way as long as this is happening in a Muslim country, 
not a Christian country. 
In a Christian country, it is right as long as it is applied within the Muslim minority, but the country's Christian or secularist laws should always prevail.

Let me sum this up: Ellison's a Democrat who advocates their communist agenda including pro-abortion, pro-homosexual and same sex marriage, which is completely diametric to the tenets of Islam. He claims he's a Muslim, but doesn't follow the teachings of Islam. If he isn't following the teachings of Islam, how can he say he's only following his religion when he demands that he be allowed to use the Qur'an to take his oath of office?Any law which contradicts the Qur'an or Sunnah is unlawful." Legally, I'm not sure how this could be done, but Keith Ellison should not be sworn into office to serve in the U.S. Congress because he cannot uphold his oath. The oath of office taken by members of Congress is in complete conflict with his Islamic laws. Remember: "

Ms. Kidd, I have to admit that your absolutely right this time. It is contradicting plain logic. But have you considered him as a crypto-Zionist, because Zionists are extremely liberal when it comes to such issues, or a hypocrite nominal Muslim whom you should not consider to be a representation of Muslim people anywhere, or consider his previous Christian life as a Catholic? I am not demeaning Catholics, but it is well known that too many Catholic priest as well as Jewish rabbis  molested young boys. Did you consider that he might have been on those boy?

Ms. Kidd, when you feel like criticizing Islam or anything in general, please, get your information from the right sources, clear your mind in order not to be biased, and then sit down and write your newspaper's column. Your column targets both Idiots and non-Idiots. You would not be happy to know that your are being followed by those who are idiots.

Ms. Kidd charges ALL Muslims of being a whole bunch of murders and terrorists who dominate the USA and replace its constitution with "terrible" Shariah (Islamic Jurisprudence), and definitely believes that the main source of Islam, which is the Qur'an, calls for violence. She also charged the Prophet of Islam with a few things, which have been repeatedly main issues for orientalists to smear Islam since it started to spread, thus creating a threat to Christian Catholicism whose history is saturated with crimes against humanity, and whose hands are soaked in blood of Jews, Muslims and atheists.

By: Devvy Kidd
December 25, 2006

"Well, in a hadith (Muhammad's sayings), Muhammad mentioned that he has been ordered [by God] to fight people until they say there is no God but only one God [Allah].

Reading the above very carefully, the prophet said "I've been ordered", which means that that was one of his duties to carry out at that time. Consequently, Muslims nowadays are not bound by that "hadith". Some Muslim extremists might have wrongfully expanded the meaning of the hadith to serve their own personal agenda. But those rotten apples in no way represent, now or ever, the Muslim "Ummah/ nation". As I repeatedly explained, one cannot judge the greater sum by his /her judgement of the the lesser sum. It is not logical. However, it seems that Ms. Kidd is blinded by her biase, hatred, anger, and fear, therefore logic just quickly seeped through her finger like mercury.

All verses in the Qur'an regarding warring and killing have been situationaly revealed, i.e. revealed to address certain cituations that occured then. In the meantime, the Qur'an says (my translation) "if they (your enemy) opt to peace (a truce or end the war), you (Muslim army) has to to opt to peace, too". So Ms. Kidd, don't blame Muslims for not being "meek" when the situation doesn't require "meekness". Jesus himself wasn't as meek as the Christian maltitude believes. He was zealot and revelutionary, and of course as meek as a lamb when it was required. Moses wasn't meek at all.

"SHOWDOWN: THE HOLY BIBLE vs. THE QURAN". why not "THE HOLY BIBLE vs. THE HOLY QURAN". Give Muslims some curtsy! They believe that their book is holy, too. And while we are still on the topic of wars and violence, here are a few Biblical verses out of many so that you can peruse and contemplate: 

Deuteronomy 20:16

"However, in the cities of the nations the Lord your God is giving you as an inheritance, do not leave alive anything that breathes", "Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass".

Wow! Kill infants, sucklings!!! This is a God who lost his mind. No wonder the Talmudic Zionist Jews have carried out the above to the leeter during their operation "Cast Lead" in Gaza.

Psalm 137:8-9 

"O daughter of Babylon, O destroyed one, O the happiness of him who repayeth to thee thy deed, that thou hast done to us", "O the happiness of him who doth seize, And hath dashed thy sucklings on the rock!".

WOW! dashed the sucklings on the rok, like women by the river beatin the hell out of their cloth on a rock. I'm very disgusted.

Numbers 31:17-18 (New International Version) 

17 "Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man,", 18 "but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man"Jews and Christians never get tired of falsely charging  the Phrophet of Islam, Muhammad, with being a womanizer, a child molester, and  a homosexual.

Is the GOD of Israel (Yahweh) a pedophile? Numbers 31:35-40: 32,000 women, who had never slept with a man, out of them the tribute for the LORD was 32.

Could GOD Almighty's share of the 32 virgin girls be metaphoric, meaning that He didn't come down and have sex with them?  

If any wants to call Muhammad a pedophile or womanizer for marrying (not forcing into sex) a young girl and marrying multiple women throughout his life, then he should not only call his Biblical Prophets as such, but also the GOD of Israel Himself!

Well, Mohammad is not any of the above. Now let me explain the above three charges, one by one, and demonstrate that they absolutely have no ground whatsoever to stand on.

Is Muhammad a child-molester (How to explain his marriage to Aisha at nine)?

I want to start with a hypothitical conversation between Mr. X and Mr. Y

"What's your say on some one who married or had sexual intercourse with a 16 years old girl who had not yet reached maturity or puberty?”, Mr. X asked his friend Mr. YWell, the law says 16  years of age is the age of marriage, " Mr. Y answered, and then added, "But I have to admit that I don’t think that’s right” -Exactly! Is the issue  age here?" Mr. X exclaimed, "It is maturity. If a nine year old girl has reached puberty and is mature then what is the problem?

Aswering a question with a question is an excelent way of approaching a problem. It is thought-provoking. Often the question forces the questioner to answer his/her own question within the response.

What is important here is not some random age. It is well known that humans in hot countries mature much faster that humans in colder climates. I searched this very issue, and  I discovered that the earliest recorded of an early-age pregnancy was an eight year old girl in South America! Aisha was therefore mature enough for this marriage. These are some other issues that could be mentioned: 1. it was God who ordered the marriage of Aisha to the Prophet, 2.  marrying the Prophet at such a young age, Aisha was raised, nurtured and became an authority on Islam. It is a fact that she became one of this religion's greatest Scholars, 3. surely any objection to such a young marriage can only be made if it can be shown that some harm was caused because of such marriage. On the contrary, all evidences point to the opposite in  case of this marriage. It was a marriage full of love and happiness, 4. according to Ibn Sa’d (The Women of Madina ), Aisha was in fact already promised in marriage even before she was married to the Prophet. This shows that arranged marriages at young ages was then quite normal in the Arabian society5. Abu-Bakr, Aisha's father, was the one who asked the Prophet why he had not consummated the marriage with Aisha, which he did when she became 12 years old.

Added to the above: 1. many of the Bible's Prophets married girls of the same age. Also, Mary was 12 when she married old Joseph. 2. child brides as young as 8 were common, not exceptions, among the Byzantine emperors and nobility, 3. My own sister, according to the consent age in Egypt married at the age of 16. My sister's marriage is considereded child molestation in some other countries.

The age of sexual consent is still quite low in many places. In Japan, people can legally have sex at age of 13, and in Spain they can legally have sex at age 12, in the Vatican state it is 12. See age of consent in Europe hereHere, and  here.

A 40-year-old man having sex with a 14-year-old woman may be a "pedophile" in the USA today, but not in China today where the age of consent is 14, nor in the USA last century.

Stop blowing this Shofar!

I always searched for the truth, and my mentioning of those Biblical verses was nothing but stating that the Christian Bible contained them. Therefore, I personally believe that followers of the three major religions should abstain from attacking each other, but reason, not argue, for finding a common truth that may thread the three religions on the same divine string.

Now, let me discuss Ms. Kidd allegation that Muhammad was a womanizer, due to the fact that he married many women.

By: Devvy Kidd
December 25, 2006

Before Muhammad declared himself to be the messenger of God, he was a young man living in Mecca, nicknamed "Al-Ameen/the trustworthy one", by the people of Mecca, and he never worshiped any of the images (statues, idols" that filled the Kabah (temple) at his time. He also never participated in any of his pool activities, like going to a tavern for drinking, or getting himself engaged in any of those sexual activities which are currently abundant in the American society. Therefore, due to his modesty, trutworthfulness and well- reputed mannerism, a rich Meccan woman named Khadijah, who was double his age, hired him to tend on her flocks. 

Later Khadijah allowed him to trade for her up-north of the Arabian peninsula. 

As a merchant, he was so honest in his transactions that Khadijah offered herself to him in marriage. Khadijah gave him a son, whom he named after the patriarch, Ibrahim (Abraham), and who died at a very young age. At the time, Muhammad contemplated at cave "Hira') in one of the mountains about Mecca. There he had his first encounter with the "Archangle Gabriel". The encounter having a deep impact on Muhammad, he went home shaking and sweating. Asked by his wife why he was shivering, he told her the story of his encounter. Khadijah consulted with one of her relatives, named "Waraqa Ibn Nawfal" who was Christian. Waraqah confirmed to Khadijah that her husband was visited by "Al-Namoos Al-Akbar/Archangle Gabriel), and also told her that Muhammad had been chosen for a message that will cause him lots of troubles. Khadijah supported Muhammad all the way in carrying out his mission and then died. After the death of Khadijah, Muhammad had a heavy load of trouble by the Meccan people, including some of his own tribe and some of his uncles.

Meccan people who nicknamed Muhammad "Al-Ameen" were against Muhammad message which critisized their worship to the idols.

Arabs from everywhere in the Arabian peninsula performed pilgrimage to Mecca once year to offer sacrifices to their idols that represented them in Ka'aba, and also to trade. Hence, Mecca was a thriving trading center at least once a year. Meccans, specially the wealthy families considered Muhammad a great danger to their interest. So one is right to deduct that their hatred was not directed towards "the trustful one" as they called him, but towards his message which was harmful to their own interest.

The relative main point of the story is to show the normal marriage life Muhammad had, and that he married a woman far more older than he was.

Later, Muhammad married again, and again. I am not going to give individual details of his marriages, but I am going to explain why did Muhammad marry many times: 1. he married a widows whose husbands died in the battlefield or were husbandless and without someone to support them, 2. He married "Hafsah", the daughter of his close friend "Omar Ibn Al-Khattab", whose little beauty was an obstacle for her for men to ask for her hand in marriage.  Omar offered his daughter in marriage to Muhammad, 3.  he married a woman to tighten the connection between him and her clan that reverted to Islam, 4. He married young "Aishah" at the request of his closest friend "Abu-Bakr", and 5. All of Muhammad's wives were not young at the time he married them, except for "Aishah"

The main point is that there was legitimate reasons for Muhammad's marriages. None theless, someone may say, Yes there were reasons all right, but not love. I would then say that:  

1.  Muhammed may have married those women for reasons other than love, but he did not harbor hatred towards them, but all respect. Love might have grown during marriage, 
2. Muhammad was so fair towards his wives that he equally divided  the nights (sleeping with his wives) amongst his wives. It is known that he loved Aishah more than his other wives, and it is also reported that he said, "God, I've equally divided what I own and control. But I couln't do the same as regards what I cannot control [meaning heart affairs]. And it is also reported that whenever Muhammad was asked who was the closest wife to his heart, he always mentioned Khadijah who died long time ago. Aishah her self was jelous of this fact.

Added to the above, Muhammad married between 9 or 12 times in his whole life, BUT he never had more than FOUR wives at the same time. He never broke the divine rule revealed to him that Muslims were allowed to marry upto four women, which is also critisized by orientalists because of their ignorance of what the Qir'an stated in this regard (Qur'an states that if a Muslim is afraid that he cannot be equally fair with his wife (which is a sin), he shold marry only one wife. Thus, the rule for marriage in Islam is to only one women. Therefore, marrying more than one woman is not the rule, but the exception and if certain circumstances arise. Those circumstance are discussed in details in the Islamic jurisprodence, and they are very serious circumstances. Some Muslims have abused the rule, however, Islam as a religion is not to blame.

Someone may say, all right, Muhammad may have had only four woman at the same time, but still he could have divorced a wife to replace her with another wife, so still he was a womanizer.

My answer is a big fat NO, for the following reasons:  

1. There were reasons behind Muhammad's divorce to his wives. Such reasons are stated in the Islamic history and Biography of the life of the prophet (Sirah Nabawiyyah). anybody can read and critisize their logic and authinticities if he/she wants,  
2.If Muhammad was a lusty man who had a big appetite for sex, he could have married as many as he wanted, and could have had, on top of that, hundreds of concubines and slave. King David and King Soloman, who are considered by Muslims to be prophets, had hundreds of concubines who were sexually accessable to them. Muhammad did not have this previllage, and  
3. As regards marriage to more than one woman, it was not a novice phenomenon during Muhammad's time. Men married more than one woman all the time. Ancient Sumerians and Babylonians, ancient Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, and monarchies in Europe, and Jews and Christian in the old times married more than one wife.

Was Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, homosexual? This is a one-zillion dollar question, and there are many people who are striving to win even a fraction of the one Zillion. Well, before answering the question, let us read some shocking comments I found on this site, TOPIX:  

1. Anonymous said: I have reasons to believe muhammad was a homosexual , as in liking man and specially younger boys. My only statement for this is that in those times girls must have only dug the cool Christian/Jew guys and saw the Muslims as common scum. So like many other , mohammad started dating 0y old boys and older men orgy's from time to time ?,  

2. Anon1 said: Sounds legitimate what you are saying.,  

3. Anonymous said: That makes complete sense. I mean, look at the muslims; what did they have going for them? They invented Algebra...hooray? I don't know about you guys, but the women I've dated..well, they're just not into math. The christians of europe were all ripped and athletic and the jews had tons of gold, so how could they compete?,  

 4. Sham said: No-one is proving otherise so i must agree,  

 5. Anon1 said: I like where this is going. I heard the same thing from my Muslim comrades. I read it in the Quran too..., 

 6. Anonymous said: I  heard that Muhammad enjoys the occasional cleveland steamer...for those of you who dont no what that is: its when, during sex, your partner poops on you., 

7. Anon1 said: I read it in the bible 8-),  

 8. Anon1 said: you hear that muslims?!?! your "prophet" likes a big ole' mound of butt jam smeared all over his chest!!! Don't know about the rest of you, but i usually leave a party when that shit (no pun intended...ok, yes it was) starts happening, 

9. KingKong said: In our society Homosexuality is rampant. Go to mosque and you'll would find men holding hands, walking leaning on each other's shoulders caressing hands and innocently keeping hands on each other's butt. Why do we see this and ignore it not take it as homosexuality? Mohammad accepted homosexuality. It's nothing wrong with being homo. MUSLIM MEN HATE WOMEN. THE SEX WITH WOMEN IS ONLY FOR PRO-CREATION, OTHERWISE WE PREFER MEN BETTER.,  

10. Piece said: Mohammad was a Pervert., and  

11. Abu Bakr said: I do not believe he was a homosexual, proper. He just had sex with women, children and men and very likey with the donkey that he speaks with in the Qu'ran too though I do admit he wmost likey raped the donkey as even the donkey himself was disgusted by the lewdness of Muhammad, read the Qu'ran. If it had a pulse and a hole, Muhammad was up for it. He was just a vile sexual predator with an insatible lust for sex with whoever or whatever he cast his eye upon. There is a story in the Qu'ran that he comes across a 2 yr old baby girl and says that if he is still alive when she reaches marrying age, he will have her. Thank God (not the Moon god Allah) he died before this could happen. Now I cannot see the attraction of a 2 yr old baby girl, Muhammad obviously could, as I say he was a vile, disgusting and filthy sexual predator.

After reading the above comments, one will notice the following: 1. Comments started by Mr. Anonymous, and then went back and forth mostly between him and Mr. Adan1, 2.Their judgement is mainly based on hearsay (I heard), and lying by saying, I have read in the Qur'an. Others also threw their bucket in, 3. Commentators seem to be young, and not well-educated, which is an attempt to throw legitimacy on their lyingQur'an, on the contrary forbids homosexuality, and I challenge anyone to prove otherwise), 4. Baseless hatred toward Islam, Muslims, and Muslims culture is so striking, 5. Ignorance about Islam, Muslims, and Muslims way of life is so striking, and 6. Influence of  the offensive Muhammad's cartoon is so obvious.

If the above is the general attitude amongst the young generation in the WEST (Europe and the USA), and in Israel, then no wonder that Muslims are being hated and discriminated in those countries.

ABC prime time, How Muslims are treated in America
NP: Notice that the shop keeper is a Jew, the people sympathizing with the Muslim woman are decent christian people, the Jewish shop keep is capitalizing on 9/11 and his statements are totally illogical, or What I personally "a saying that may sound truthfull, but said for the purpose of evil"

Multen Ilhan, world religions professor, discusses the media bias and discrimination suffered by Muslim in 21st century America in her presentation.

A lawsuit stops discrimination against Muslim women in Omaha

What is a rumor? 

A rumor is a little story that goes around from one mouth to another, get expananded in the process of communication by adding false information to it, self-projections, or open ions, then according to the universal law of expansion and contraction, gets contracted, compressed and simplified, and in the process loses some of its elements, then gets expanded again, and so on until it completely loses any element of truth, if there was any , and the false information prevails.


The big lie that Muhammad is homosexual went exactly through the above phases being based on the following strory: Muhammad and his followers suffered a great deal of undescribable toruture by the Meccan people due to reasons I have dicussed in the previous articles. People of "Medinah"; a city located a few hundred miles away from Mecca were interested in Muhammad's "Dawah/call". So Muhammad decided to migrate to Medinah. The night before his migration, the meccans plotted to raid his house and kill him while he was asleep. "Ali", Muhammad's cousin, a young man at the time who reverted to Islam, volunteered to sleep in Muhammad's bed. At dawn when the Meccan raided the house, they found the wrong man in Muhammad's bed. the Meccan chased Muhammad and his close friend Abu-Bakr but they failed to catch them.

Based on the above story and assuming that Muhammad spent the night in his bed with his cousin Ali, the anti-Islam orientalists spread the rumour that Muhammad slept with Ali and had sex with him. They even went far beyond that and fabricated other stories.

Now, let us see what Islam  and Muhammad said about homosexuality.

Islam and Homosexuality 

There are 5 references in the Qur'an which have been cited as referring to gay and lesbian behavior. Some obviously deal with effeminate men and "masculine women." The two main references to homosexual behavior are: 1. "We also sent Lut : He said to his people : "Do ye commit lewdness such as no people in creation (ever) committed before you? For ye practice your lusts on men in preference to women: ye are indeed a people transgressing beyond bounds." Qur'an 7:80-81, and 2. "What! Of all creatures do ye come unto the males, and leave the wives your Lord created for you? Nay, but ye are forward folk." Qur'an 26:165

Both references relate to gay sexual activities; lesbian practices are not explicitly mentioned in the Qur'an. But does this mean that lesbian practises are permitted because of the simple fact that they have not been mention in the Qur'an? Of course not, and I'll prove it.

Many Hadiths, which are collections of saying attributed to Mohammad, (pl.: ahadith) discuss "liwat/sexual intercourse between males"; a word derived from the name of prophet "Lut/Lot" . Two examples are: 1. "When a man mounts another man, the throne of God shakes.", the prophet said., 2. "Kill the one that is doing it and also kill the one that it is being done to." (in reference to the active and passive partners in gay sexual intercourse)

Lesbian behavior was mentioned one time in the Hadith: "Sihaq/(lesbian sexual activity) of women is zina (illegitimate sexual intercourse) among them."

In the Qur'an there is a very eloquent verse that forbids anal sex in general for both man and women whether they be active or passive. And also forbids lesbianism: "Wa'Tu Harthakum Anna She'tum", which can be translated as (my translation): "Approach your TILL in any manner you like".

There is a story about why this verse was revealed: A man came to the prophet of Islam crying and shouting, O Allah' messenger, I have perished. The Prophet asked him why he thought so. The man said that he approached his wife from behind (rear-up position). The prophet asked him where he did insert his penis (her vagina or her anus) The man said, her vagina. The prophet then said that he did not sin.

Back to the verse mentioned above, there is a very important word contained in that verse, and that single word implies the following:  

1. copulatin between man and a woment must be penis-vagina one, 
2. anal sex is forbidden, and  
3. foreplay before copulation is recommended.

This important word is "Harth", which means in English "till, field".  "Harth" is a noun derived from the three-letter verb "Ha.Ra.Tha", which means to "plough/stir, toil, prepare for planting). Hence, it is recommended for husband and wife to have foreplay before the intercourse, the husband has to deposit hes seeds in a land that is capable of producing (vagina), not the (anus) which is uncapable of producing; man's seeds will be like being thrown on a stone, not a fertile land. Consequently and  comparatively lesbianism is forbidden based on the same concept of production and fertility.

Treatment of homosexuals within Islam

There is a consensus among Islamic scholars that all humans are naturally heterosexual. Homosexuality is seen by scholars to be a sinful and perverted deviation from the norm. All Islamic schools of thought and jurisprudence consider gay acts to be unlawful. They differ only in terms of penalty:  

1. The Hanafite school (currently seen mainly in South and Eastern Asia) teaches that no physical punishment is warranted,  
2. The Hanabalites, (widely followed in the Arab world) teach that severe punishment is warranted,  
3. The Sha'fi school of thought (also seen in the Arab world) requires a minimum of 4 adult male witnesses before a person can be found guilty of a homosexual act., and  
4. The Maliki school says that anyone (married or unmarried) found to have committed same-sex intercourse should be punished as an adulterer.

You can get more information here

So Ms. Kidd, I saw your picture on your web site.
from near your outside looks beautiful,
your inside is far from beauty.

To me you're a beautiful Chinese vase, but invested with spider webs in the inside

Beware of the false media

Bulletinboard (BB)

Bulletinboard (BB)
Advertisement, posts, post labels, video clips, slideshows, current events, fiction, humor, cartoon, other stuff, etc...

BB: Most Recent Posts

BB: Most Recent, Most Popular, Most Important Posts

BB: Most Recent, Most Popular, Most Important Posts

Most Popular Posts (All Time)

BB: Great Blogs

BB: Great Blogs

BB: Blogs and Feeds Worth Visiting

BB: Palestine is for the Palestinians

BB: Palestine is for the Palestinians

BB: Alan Hart

Click links below for Playlists

BB: History of Palestine/The Zionist Story

Click link below for Playlist

BB: Zionism ( Lies, Deception, Terrorism)

BB: Zionism ( Lies, Deception, Terrorism)

BB: Zionist Israel

Click links below to play video
Zionist Israel





BB: Video Clips

BB: Video Clips

BB: Importand Vids

Click link under image for playlist

Noam Chomsky
Norman Fenkelstein
Shalomo Sand

Helen Thomas
John Pilger
David Duke


Click link below to watch video
 USA/Israel Hypocricy


BB: Slideshows

BB: Slideshows

BB: Poetry and Fiction - Click on picture

BB: Quotes from the TALMUD

BB: Quotes from the TALMUD
Talmudic quoutes

BB: Talmudic Quotes

CLAIM 01: "A pregnant non-Jew is no better
than a pregnant animal.
Coschen hamischpat 405.

RESPONSE: The above quote is a wrong inference from a fiscal law in Shulchan Oruch, Choshen Mishpat 405.3, that relates to times when slavery was a standard and accepted practice across the world.

BLOGGER: Response is BS. Even during the time mentioned above, the quote of Talmud, which is supposed to be a holy book, should not be as it is.

CLAIM 02: "It is permitted to take the body and the life of a Gentile." Sepher ikkarim III c 25.

RESPONSE: This is a misquotation. Rabbi Yosef Albo (the author) was asked by a Christian thinker about seeming injustice of the laws of Judaism dealing with charging interest on a loan. (According to Deuteronomy 23:20 and 23:21, a Jew is not allowed to lend with interest to another Jew, but may do so to a Gentile).

R. Albo answers: The "Gentile" or "heathen" in the above passage refers to idolater, who refuses to keep seven Noahide laws. The laws are universal for all mankind: A) prohibition of idolatry, B) prohibition of blasphemy, C) prohibition of murder, D) prohibition of immorality and promiscuity, E) prohibition of theft, F) establishment of judicial system, G) prohibition of cruelty to animals.

Such a person, who does not respect other's rights, places himself apart from human community and therefore can expect to be treated according to his own rules. He is a threat to everyone around and hence if somebody kills him, that person is not charged. On the contrary, even according to non-Jewish philosophers in those days (14th and 15th century, Spain), as R Albo brings, such a person should be killed. So it is regarding money matters: the prohibition of taking interest, that applies to everybody, including a non-Jew who keeps the Noahide laws (as R. Albo mentions a few sentences earlier), do not apply to him.

BLOGGER: What a crackpot full of steaming shit. First, an idolater is not obliged to follow the Nohide laws. Second, even if he is, but violates them all or part thereof, he does not deserve to be killed by someone. Third, one can not just kill someone who has a different belief. Anybody is free to believe in whatever he wants as far as no harm is
done to those living around him when the belief is carried out into action.

CLAIM 03: "It is the law to kill anyone who denies the Torah. The Christians belong to the denying ones of the
" Coschen hamischpat 425 Hagah 425.

RESPONSE: This is from the Shulcan Aruch and applies to killing Jewish heretics. The following line in this passage is that this law does not apply to anyone non-Jewish and it is forbidden to harm any gentile. The Jewish heretics are people which are a potential cause of harm and trouble to the Jewish nation. The penalty is designed to demonstrate the severity with which heretical views were considered, rather than a practical penalty as such penalties were rarely imposed. E.S./David S. Maddison.

BLOGGER: The quote says, “anyone who denies the Torah”, then immediately followed by, “The Christians belong to the denying ones of the Torah.” I cannot find any reference to Jewish heretics, or “it is forbidden to harm any gentile”. Response is nothing but hogwash.

BB: Monthly news of rabbis sexual perversion & other crimes.

BB: Monthly news of rabbis sexual perversion & other crimes.
Click on picture!

BB: Pervert Rabbis

BB: Cases of shame

CASES OF SHAME: What is a rabbi?

The word "Rabbi" refers to one of the ancient scribes - supposedly a holy man - who participated in writing the "Talmud". In Arabic, which is a Semitic language and a cousin to Hebrew, the word is"Rabbanie", or "Rabbie", means a godly man. My question is, are they really godly? I strongly doubt that. Below are some of their news…

Israel's new Ashkenazi chief rabbi case: JERUSALEM: Israel's new Ashkenazi chief rabbi is facing growing calls to step down amid allegations of misconduct. The allegations center on sexual harassment charges against Yona Metzger, as well as charges that he engaged in fraud and is not qualified for the post. Aides to Metzger have rejected the allegations as a smear campaign fueled by political rivals.

Metzger and his Sephardi counterpart, Rabbi Shlomo Amar, were elected as Israel's chief rabbis April 14 by a 150-member public committee. Since then, however,
opposition to Metzger has grown. In the latest development, a Tel Aviv accountant filed a petition Monday in the High Court of Justice challenging Metzger's appointment. It will be heard by a three-judge panel.

The petition claims that allegations of fraud and other improprieties involving Metzger were not fully investigated because of his 1998 pledge not to stand for chief rabbi of Tel Aviv. Metzger's spokesman, Roni Rimon, told the Israeli daily Ma'ariv that the petition was full of "lies, lies and more lies" produced by "professional slanderers.". Metzger had been accused of forging witnesses' signatures on marriage contracts and unlawfully demanding payment for performing weddings, the daily Ha'aretz reported. As a result of the allegations, Metzger's permit to serve as a chief rabbi of a major city was revoked. However, it was reinstated several months later after a hearing before three senior Israeli rabbis -- including Eliyahu Bakshi - Doron, a former Sephardi chief rabbi -- who accepted Metzger's explanations and his commitment to leave the Tel Aviv race, the paper said.

The petition also argues that the Metzger, 50, who previously was rabbi of north Tel Aviv, was not qualified to
fill the chief rabbi's duties as head of the country's rabbinic court system because he never had been a religious judge or rabbi of a major city. The
petition maintained that the elections committee for the chief rabbi was not adequately informed of the misconduct allegations against Metzger. In related development, Ma'ariv recently published what it said were sexual harassment allegations involving Metzger. Three weeks before Metzger's election as chief
rabbi, the paper reported, it learned of complaints from four adult men who
claimed Metzger had touched their arms, legs and chests and expressed admiration for their muscular physiques.

Park Avenue rabbi Case: A prominent Park Avenue rabbi had a mistress nearly half his age sign a bizarre cohabitation contract - promising she’d get liposuction, become better educated and continue their already hot-and-heavy sexual relationship in exchange for half his house, the woman claims in a bombshell lawsuit. Janet Pizzo says she had a seven-year affair with the married Metropolitan Synagogue Rabbi Joel Goor - which included recurring steamy sex in his rabbinical office while he lied to his wife about his whereabouts. But their courtship crumbled when she suspected him of having another girlfriend, and he’s since become vindictive. She even caught him on audio tape threatening to prance around their Bronxhome naked in front of her 17-year-old daughter.

You’ve got to move,Goor says, according to an audio tape reviewed by The Post. “This is my house . . . I’m allowed to walk around nude in my house. So you better tell [her daughter] Mary,Goor told Pizzo.“I’m allowed to walk round this house . . . and I’m going to.”. Goor’s lawyer declined to comment on the allegations. “I truly loved this guy, I really did,” said a weepy Pizzo, 48, complaining how the 73-year-old Man of God locked her out of their bedroom, removed the cushions from her couch and vowed to unplug the refrigerator. http://www.canonist.com/?p=1245

BB: More corruption: human organ trafficking and money laundering case.

Remember the group of Zionist Jews in New Jersey, USA, who were involved in human organ trafficking, the Zionists were heavily into human organ trafficking. Nonetheless, the controlled media stooges quickly suppressed the information, and today we hear very little of it. See them below being arrested by the FBI. Please, click on picture.

BB: Criminal Rabbis

BB: The Greater Israel and their own words out of the horse's mouth

BB: The Greater Israel and their own words out of the horse's mouth

BB: Current Events

BB: Current Events

BB: Humor

BB: Humor

Sons of Satan

Click om image to enlarge

Jews; offspring of Satan

BB: Miscellaneous

BB: Miscellaneous

Zionist Israel

1. "There is a huge gap between us (Jews) and our enemies, not just in ability but in morality, culture, sanctity of life, and conscience. They are our neighbors here, but it seems as if at a distance of a few hundred meters away, there are people who do not belong to our continent, to our world, but actually belong to a different galaxy." Israeli president Moshe Katsav. The Jerusalem Post, May 10, 2001

2. "The Palestinians are like crocodiles, the more you give them meat, they want more".... Ehud Barak, Prime Minister of Israel at the time - August 28, 2000. Reported in the Jerusalem Post August 30, 2000

3. " [The Palestinians are] beasts walking on two legs." Menahim Begin, speech to the Knesset, quoted in Amnon Kapeliouk, "Begin and the Beasts". New Statesman, 25 June 1982.

4. "The Palestinians" would be crushed like grasshoppers ... heads smashed against the boulders and walls." Isreali Prime Minister (at the time) in a speech to Jewish settlers New York Times April 1, 1988

5. "When we have settled the land, all the Arabs will be able to do about it will be to scurry around like drugged cockroaches in a bottle." Raphael Eitan, Chief of Staff of the Israeli Defence Forces, New York Times, 14 April 1983.

6. "How can we return the occupied territories? There is nobody to return them to." Golda Maier, March 8, 1969.

7. "There was no such thing as Palestinians, they never existed." Golda Maier Israeli Prime Minister June 15, 1969

8. "The thesis that the danger of genocide was hanging over us in June 1967 and that Israel was fighting for its physical existence is only bluff, which was born and developed after the war." Israeli General Matityahu Peled, Ha'aretz, 19 March 1972.

9. David Ben Gurion (the first Israeli Prime Minister): "If I were an Arab leader, I would never sign an agreement with Israel. It is normal; we have taken their country. It is true God promised it to us, but how could that interest them? Our God is not theirs. There has been Anti - Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault ? They see but one thing: we have come and we have stolen their country. Why would they accept that?" Quoted by Nahum Goldmann in Le Paraddoxe Juif (The Jewish Paradox), pp121.

10. Ben Gurion also warned in 1948 : "We must do everything to insure they ( the Palestinians) never do return." Assuring his fellow Zionists that Palestinians will never come back to their homes. "The old will die and the young will forget."

11. "We have to kill all the Palestinians unless they are resigned to live here as slaves." Chairman Heilbrun of the Committee for the Re-election of General Shlomo Lahat, the mayor of Tel Aviv, October 1983.

12. "Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that . . . I want to tell you something very clear: Don't worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it." - Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, October 3, 2001, to Shimon Peres, as reported on Kol Yisrael radio. (Certainly the FBI's cover-up of the Israeli spy ring/phone tap scandal suggests that Mr. Sharon may not have been joking.) 

13. "We declare openly that the Arabs have no right to settle on even one centimeter of Eretz Israel... Force is all they do or ever will understand. We shall use the ultimate force until the Palestinians come crawling to us on all fours." Rafael Eitan, Chief of Staff of the Israeli Defense Forces - Gad Becker, Yediot Ahronot 13 April 1983, New York Times 14 April 1983.

14. "We must do everything to ensure they [the Palestinian refugees] never do return" David Ben-Gurion, in his diary, 18 July 1948, quoted in Michael Bar Zohar's Ben-Gurion: the Armed Prophet, Prentice-Hall, 1967, p. 157.

15. " ... we should prepare to go over to the offensive with the aim of smashing Lebanon, Trans-jordan and Syria... The weak point in the Arab coalition is Lebanon [for] the Moslem regime is artificial and easy to undermine. A Christian state should be established... When we smash the [Arab] Legions strength and bomb Amman, we will eliminate Transjordan, too, and then Syria will fall. If Egypt still dares to fight on, we shall bomb Port Said, Alexandria, and Cairo." " David Ben-Gurion, May 1948, to the General Staff. From Ben-Gurion, A Biography, by Michael Ben-Zohar, Delacorte, New York 1978.

16. "We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population." Israel Koenig, "The Koenig Memorandum"

17. "Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you because geography books no longer exist. Not only do the books not exist, the Arab villages are not there either. Nahlal arose in the place of Mahlul; Kibbutz Gvat in the place of Jibta; Kibbutz Sarid in the place of Huneifis; and Kefar Yehushua in the place of Tal al-Shuman. There is not a single place built in this country that did not have a former Arab population." Moshe Dayan, address to the Technion, Haifa, reported in Haaretz, April 4, 1969.

18. "We walked outside, Ben-Gurion accompanying us. Allon repeated his question, What is to be done with the Palestinian population?' Ben-Gurion waved his hand in a gesture which said 'Drive them out!'" Yitzhak Rabin, leaked censored version of Rabin memoirs, published in the New York Times, 23 October 1979.

19. Rabin's description of the conquest of Lydda, after the completion of Plan Dalet. "We shall reduce the Arab population to a community of woodcutters and waiters" Uri Lubrani, PM Ben-Gurion's special adviser on Arab Affairs, 1960. From "The Arabs in Israel" by Sabri Jiryas.

20. "There are some who believe that the non-Jewish population, even in a high percentage, within our borders will be more effectively under our surveillance; and there are some who believe the contrary, i.e., that it is easier to carry out surveillance over the activities of a neighbor than over those of a tenant. [I] tend to support the latter view and have an additional argument:...the need to sustain the character of the state which will henceforth be Jewish...with a non-Jewish minority limited to 15 percent. I had already reached this fundamental position as early as 1940 [and] it is entered in my diary." Joseph Weitz, head of the Jewish Agency's Colonization Department. From Israel: an Apartheid State by Uri Davis, p.5.

21. "Everybody has to move, run and grab as many hilltops as they can to enlarge the settlements because everything we take now will stay ours... Everything we don't grab will go to them." Ariel Sharon, Israeli Foreign Minister, addressing a meeting of militants from the extreme right-wing Tsomet Party, Agence France Presse, November 15, 1998.

22. "It is the duty of Israeli leaders to explain to public opinion, clearly and courageously, a certain number of facts that are forgotten with time. The first of these is that there is no Zionism,colonialization or Jewish State without the eviction of the Arabs and the expropriation of their lands." Yoram Bar Porath, Yediot Aahronot, of 14 July 1972.

23. "Spirit the penniless population across the frontier by denying it employment... Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly." Theodore Herzl, founder of the World Zionist Organization, speaking of the Arabs of Palestine,Complete Diaries, June 12, 1895 entry.

24. "One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail." -- Rabbi Yaacov Perrin, Feb. 27, 1994 [Source: N.Y. Times, Feb. 28, 1994, p. 1]

25. "We Jews, we are the destroyers and will remain the destroyers. Nothing you can do will meet our demands and needs. We will forever destroy because we want a world of our own." (You Gentiles, by Jewish Author Maurice Samuels, p. 155).

26. "We will have a world government whether you like it or not. The only question is whether that government will be achieved by conquest or consent." (Jewish Banker Paul Warburg, February 17, 1950, as he testified before the U.S. Senate).

27. "We will establish ourselves in Palestine whether you like it or not...You can hasten our arrival or you can equally retard it. It is however better for you to help us so as to avoid our constructive powers being turned into a destructive power which will overthrow the world." (Chaim Weizmann, Published in "Judische Rundschau," No. 4, 1920)

28. "Our race is the Master Race. We are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves." - Israeli prime Minister Menachem Begin in a speech to the Knesset [Israeli Parliament] quoted by Amnon Kapeliouk, "Begin and the Beasts," New Statesman, June 25, 1982

29. "Tell me, do the evil men of this world have a bad time? They hunt and catch whatever they feel like eating. They don't suffer from indigestion and are not punished by Heaven. I want Israel to join that club. Maybe the world will then at last begin to fear us instead of feeling sorry. Maybe they will start to tremble, to fear our madness instead of admiring our nobility. Let them tremble; let them call us a mad state. Let them understand that we are a savage country, dangerous to our surroundings, not normal, that we might go wild, that we might start World War Three just like that, or that we might one day go crazy and burn all the oil fields in the Middle East. Even if you'll prove to me that the present war is a dirty immoral war, I don't care. We shall start another war, kill and destroy more and more. And do you know why it is all worth it? Because it seems that this war has made us more unpopular among the civilized world.We'll hear no more of that nonsense about the unique Jewish morality. No more talk about a unique people being a light upon the nations. No more uniqueness and no more sweetness and light. Good riddance." -- Former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon

30. "The Modern Age is the Jewish Age, and the twentieth century, in particular, is the Jewish Century." -Yuri Slezkine, Professor of History at University of California, Berkeley, "The Jewish Century"; Princeton University Press

31. "What shocks and worries me is the narrow-mindedness and the shortsightedness of our military leaders. They seem to presume that the State of Israel may or even must-behave in the realm of international relations according to the laws of the jungle- -the long chain of false incidents and hostilities we have invented, and so many clashes we have provoked;" - From Diary of Moshe Sharett, former Primer Minister of Israel in Livia Rokach, Israel's Sacred Terrorism published 980

32. Hebrew essayist Achad Ha-Am, after paying a visit to Palestine in 1891: "Abroad we are accustomed to believe that Israel is almost empty; nothing is grown here and that whoever wishes to buy land could come here and buy what his heart desires. In reality, the situation is not like this. Throughout the country it is difficult to find cultivable land which is not already cultivated."

33. The Balfour Declaration to Baron Rothchild, on the 2nd of November, 1917: "His Majesty's Government view with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country."

34. Lord Sydenham, Hansard, House of Lords, 21 June 1922: "If we are going to admit claims on conquest thousands of years ago, the whole world will have to be turned upside down."

35. 1923:Vladimir Jabotinsky, The Iron Wall, "Zionist colonization must either be terminated or carried out against the wishes of the native population. This colonization can, therefore, be continued and make progress only under the protection of a power independent of the native population - an iron wall, which will be in a position to resist the pressure to the native population. This is our policy towards the Arabs..."

36. Vladimir Jabotinsky, founder of Revisionist Zionism (precursor of Likud), The Iron Wall, 1923: "A voluntary reconciliation with the Arabs is out of the question either now or in the future. If you wish to colonize a land in which people are already living, you must provide a garrison for the land, or find some rich man or benefactor who will provide a garrison on your behalf. Or else-or else, give up your colonization, for without an armed force which will render physically impossible any attempt to destroy or prevent this colonization, colonization is impossible, not difficult, not dangerous, but IMPOSSIBLE!... Zionism is a colonization adventure and therefore it stands or falls by the question of armed force. It is important... to speak Hebrew, but, unfortunately, it is even more important to be able to shoot - or else I am through with playing at colonizing."

37. David Ben Gurion, future Prime Minister of Israel, 1937, Ben Gurion and the Palestine Arabs, Oxford University Press, 1985: "We must expel Arabs and take their places." 
38. Joseph Weitz, head of the Jewish Agency's Colonization Department in 1940. From "A Solution to the Refugee Problem": "Between ourselves it must be clear that there is no room for both peoples together in this country. We shall not achieve our goal if the Arabs are in this small country. There is no other way than to transfer the Arabs from here to neighboring countries - all of them. Not one village, not one tribe should be left."

39. Israeli official Arthur Lourie in a letter to Walter Eytan, director general of the Israeli Foreign Ministry (ISA FM 2564/22). From Benny Morris, "The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem 1947-49", p. 297: "...if people become accustomed to the large figure and we are actually obliged to accept the return of the refugees, we may find it difficult, when faced with hordes of claimants, to convince the world that not all of these formerly lived in Israeli territory. It would, in any event, seem desirable to minimize the numbers...than otherwise."

40. David Ben-Gurion, May 1948, to the General Staff. From Ben- Gurion, A Biography, by Michael Ben-Zohar, Delacorte, New York 1978: "We should prepare to go over to the offensive. Our aim is to smash Lebanon, Trans-Jordan, and Syria. The weak point is Lebanon, for the Moslem regime is artificial and easy for us to undermine. We shall establish a Christian state there, and then we will smash the Arab Legion, eliminate Trans-Jordan; Syria will fall to us. We then bomb and move on and take Port Said, Alexandria and Sinai."

41. BenDavid -Gurion, one of the father founders of Israel, described Zionist aims in 1948: "A Christian state should be established [in Lebanon], with its southern border on the Litani river. We will make an alliance with it. When we smash the Arab Legion's strength and bomb Amman, we will eliminate Transjordan too, and then Syria will fall. If Egypt still dares to fight on, we shall bomb Port Said, Alexandria and Cairo... And in this fashion, we will end the war and settle our forefathers' account with Egypt, Assyria, and Aram"

42. [Begin, and Yitzhak Shamir who were members of the party became Prime Ministers.] Albert Einstein, Hanna Arendt and other prominent Jewish Americans, writing in The New York Times, protest the visit to America of Menachem Begin, December 1948: "Among the most disturbing political phenomena of our time is the emergence in the newly created State of Israel of the Freedom Party (Herut), a political party closely akin in its organization, method, political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties."

43. Martin Buber, Jewish Philosopher, addressed Prime Minister Ben Gurion on the moral character of the state of Israel with reference to the Arab refugees in March 1949. "We will have to face the reality that Israel is neither innocent, nor redemptive. And that in its creation, and expansion; we as Jews, have caused what we historically have suffered; a refugee population in Diaspora."

44. Moshe Dayan (Israel Defense and Foreign Minister), on February 12 1952. Radio "Israel.": "It lies upon the people's shoulders to prepare for the war, but it lies upon the Israeli army to carry out the fight with the ultimate object of erecting the Israeli Empire."

45. Martin Buber, to a NewYork audience, Jewish Newsletter, June 2, 1958: "When we [followers of the prophetic Judaism] returned to Palestine...the majority of Jewish people preferred to learn from Hitler rather than from us."

46. Aba Eban (the Israeli Foreign Minister) stated arrogantly. New York Times June 19, 1967: "If the General Assembly were to vote by 121 votes to 1 in favor of "Israel" returning to the armistice lines-- (pre June 1967 borders) "Israel" would refuse to comply with the decision."

47. Dr. Israel Shahak, Chairperson of the Israeli League for Human and Civil Rights, and a survivor of the Bergen Belsen concentration camp, Commenting on the Israeli military's Emergency Regulations following the 1967 War. Palestine, vol. 12, December 1983: "Hitler's legal power was based upon the 'Enabling Act', which was passed quite legally by the Reichstag and which allowed the Fuehrer and his representatives, in plain language, to be what they wanted, or in legal language, to issue regulations having the force of law. Exactly the same type of act was passed by the Knesset [Israeli's Parliament] immediately after the 1067 conquest granting the Israeli governor and his representatives the power of Hitler, which they use in Hitlerian manner."

48. Joseph Weitz, Director of the Jewish National Fund, the Zionist agency charged with acquiring Palestinian land, Circa 194. Machover Israca, January 5, 1973 /p.2: "The only solution is Eretz Israel [Greater Israel], or at least Western Eretz Israel [all the land west of Jordan River], without Arabs. There is no room for compromise on this point ... We must not leave a single village, not a single tribe." 
49. Israeli Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, Inferring that killing isn't murder if the victim is Gentile. Jerusalem Post, June 19,1989: "Jewish blood and a goy's [gentile's] blood are not the same."

50. Benyamin Netanyahu, then Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister, former Prime Minister of Israel, tells students at Bar Ilan University, From the Israeli journal Hotam, November 24, 1989: "Israel should have exploited the repression of the demonstrations in China, when world attention focused on that country, to carry out mass expulsions among the Arabs of the territories."

51. Former Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir declares at a Tel Aviv memorial service for former Likud leaders, November 1990. Jerusalem Domestic Radio Service: "The past leaders of our movement left us a clear message to keep Eretz Israel from the Sea to the Jordan River for future generations, for the mass aliya [immigration], and for the Jewish people, all of whom will be gathered into this country." 
52. Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, quoted in Associated Press, November 16, 2000: "If we thought that instead of 200 Palestinian fatalities, 2,000 dead would put an end to the fighting at a stroke, we would use much more force...."

53. Ben Gurion: In 1899, Davis Triestsch wrote to Herzl: " I would suggest to you to come round in time to the "Greater Palestine" program before it is too late... the Basle program must contain the words "Great Palestine" or "Palestine and its neighboring lands" otherwise it's nonsense. You do not get ten million Jews into a land of 25,000 Km2". " The present map of Palestine was drawn by the British mandate. The Jewish people have another map which our youth and adults should strive to fulfill -- From the Nile to the Euphrates."

54. Vladimir Jabotinsky (the founder and advocate of the Zionist terrorist organizations), Quoted by Maxime Rodinson in Peuple Juif ou Problem Juif. (Jewish People or Jewish Problem): "Has any People ever been seen to give up their territory of their own free will? In the same way, the Arabs of Palestine will not renounce their sovereignty without violence."

We enthusiastically chose to become a colonial society, ignoring international treaties, expropriating lands, transferring settlers from Israel to the occupied territories, engaging in theft and finding justification for all these activities. Passionately desiring to keep the occupied territories, we developed two judicial systems: one - progressive, liberal - in Israel; and the other - cruel, injurious - in the occupied territories. In effect, we established an apartheid regime in the occupied territories immediately following their capture. That oppressive regime exists to this day.



BB: ADAM YAHIYE GADAHN: A Jew who pretended to have converted to Islam assumed different aliases.

BB: ADAM YAHIYE GADAHN: A Jew who pretended to have converted to Islam assumed different aliases.

BB:They Pretended to have converted to Islam, and started talking violently to smear Islam Muslims.

BB:They Pretended to have converted to Islam, and started talking violently to smear Islam Muslims.

BB: They call themselves Jews though their ancestors never set foot in Palestine.

BB: They call themselves Jews though their ancestors never set foot in Palestine.

BB: The Real American History

BB: Books to read

BB: Books to read

BB: News Reels

BB: News Reels

BB: Misc. (Vids and other stuff)

BB: Misc. (Vids and other stuff)

BB: 9/11(Michael Moore)

BB: 9/11(Michael Moore)
Click link below for movie

BB: 9/11

The Gift of 9/11 Sept. 2008
Smoke and Dust Mar. 2009 *
Sunday Doodles Mar. 2009 *
Lessons from Oz June 2009 *
The 6,000 Feb. 2010 *